I. Whether the district court improperly denied
Petitioner pro se due process and equal protection
of law, when it denied Petitioner the right to
appearance, the right to be heard, to testify before
a tribunal, the court. Throughout the entire case
there was no hearing - denying petitioner due
process guaranteed by U.S. Const. Amend. I, IV,
V, VI, and XIV.

II. Whether the district court improperly dismissed
Petitioner 's pro se FINRA arbitration appeal case
to vacate award, pursuant to Fed. Arb. Rule 9,
Stat. 10(a)? Whether their legal conclusions that
Petitioner 's appeal to vacate award was time
barred, and barred by res judicata ? Were these
pretexts erroneous?

III. Whether the district court 's legal conclusion
dismissing as moot Petitioner 's pro se African
American minority's Motion for Summary
Judgment, on grounds of Discrimination and
Retaliation, was erroneous, wherein, the court
entered judgment of "uncontested notion " for
Summary Judgment when there was no genuine
issue, and respondent had not filed an answer?

IV. Whether the judges of the Eighth Circuit Court of
Appeals "committed errors of law and/or fact " and
whether he abused his discretion or "acted in
excess " of their jurisdiction?

Whether the district court improperly denied Petitioner pro se due process and equal protection of law