No. 23-949

In Re David Erlanson, Sr.

Lower Court: N/A
Docketed: 2024-02-29
Status: Denied
Type: Paid
Response Waived
Tags: 9th-circuit administrative-law civil-procedure civil-proceeding civil-rights criminal-penalty criminal-procedure due-process judicial-duty judicial-process mandamus separation-of-powers
Key Terms:
Environmental SocialSecurity DueProcess
Latest Conference: 2024-04-26
Question Presented (from Petition)

Can the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals indefinitely prolong or avoid its judicial duty when a judicial process in the lower district court resulted obviously in a criminal penalty being assessed within a civil proceeding, whereby the citizens private rights would normally act as a restriction upon the government in order to affect the timely resolution of the matter before them?

Question Presented (AI Summary)

Can the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals indefinitely prolong or avoid its judicial duty when a judicial process in the lower district court resulted obviously in a criminal penalty being assessed within a civil proceeding, whereby the citizens private rights would normally act as a restriction upon the government in order to affect the timely resolution of the matter before them?

Docket Entries

2024-04-29
Petition DENIED.
2024-04-10
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 4/26/2024.
2024-03-27
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2024-02-25

Attorneys

Erlanson, In Re David
David Erlanson Sr. — Petitioner
United States
Elizabeth B. PrelogarSolicitor General, Respondent