No. 23-937
Joshua James Duggar v. United States
Tags: alternative-perpetrator complete-defense constitutional-rights criminal-defense criminal-procedure due-process evidence evidence-exclusion trial-court trial-court-discretion
Latest Conference:
2024-06-20
Question Presented (from Petition)
Does the exclusion of relevant evidence of an
alternative perpetrator based on a trial court's
conclusion it is too speculative violate a criminal
defendant's constitutional right to present a complete
defense?
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Does the exclusion of relevant evidence of an alternative perpetrator based on a trial court's conclusion it is too speculative violate a criminal defendant's constitutional right to present a complete defense?
Docket Entries
2024-06-24
Petition DENIED.
2024-06-04
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 6/20/2024.
2024-05-30
Reply of petitioner Joshua James Duggar filed.
2024-05-21
Brief of respondent United States in opposition filed.
2024-04-18
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is further extended to and including May 21, 2024.
2024-04-17
Motion to extend the time to file a response from April 29, 2024 to May 21, 2024, submitted to The Clerk.
2024-03-21
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including April 29, 2024.
2024-03-20
Motion to extend the time to file a response from March 29, 2024 to April 29, 2024, submitted to The Clerk.
2024-02-21
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due March 29, 2024)
2023-12-15
Application (23A554) granted by Justice Kavanaugh extending the time to file until February 25, 2024.
2023-12-12
Application (23A554) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from December 27, 2023 to February 25, 2024, submitted to Justice Kavanaugh.
Attorneys
Joshua James Duggar
Justin Keith Gelfand — Marguils Gelfand LLC, Petitioner
United States
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent