No. 23-936

Anne Davis, on Behalf of Braeden Davis v. District of Columbia

Lower Court: District of Columbia
Docketed: 2024-02-27
Status: Denied
Type: Paid
Amici (1)Response RequestedResponse WaivedRelisted (2) Experienced Counsel
Tags: administrative-proceedings appeals civil-procedure due-process due-process-rights educational-placement idea-dispute individuals-with-disabilities-education-act special-education-law stay-put-provision
Key Terms:
DueProcess
Latest Conference: 2024-06-20 (distributed 2 times)
Question Presented (from Petition)

1. Whether and to what extent Section 1415(j) imposes obligations on school officials when a child's exact pre-dispute educational placement is no longer available.

2. Whether Section 1415(j)'s stay-put mandate applies during the appeal of an adverse district court decision resolving an IDEA dispute.

Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether and to what extent Section 1415(j) imposes obligations on school officials when a child's exact pre-dispute educational placement is no longer available

Docket Entries

2024-06-24
Petition DENIED.
2024-06-04
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 6/20/2024.
2024-06-04
Reply of petitioner Anne Davis, on Behalf of Braeden Davis filed. (Distributed)
Main DocumentCertificate of Word CountProof of ServiceMain DocumentCertificate of Word CountProof of Service
2024-05-30
Waiver of the 14-day waiting period for the distribution of the petition pursuant to Rule 15.5 filed by petitioner.
Main DocumentMain Document
2024-05-28
Brief of respondent District of Columbia in opposition filed.
Main DocumentCertificate of Word CountProof of ServiceMain DocumentCertificate of Word CountProof of Service
2024-04-26
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted in part and the time is extended to and including May 28, 2024.
2024-04-25
Motion to extend the time to file a response from May 17, 2024 to July 1, 2024, submitted to The Clerk.
Main DocumentMain Document
2024-04-25
Response to motion to extend the time to file a response from petitioner filed.
Main DocumentMain Document
2024-04-17
Response Requested. (Due May 17, 2024)
2024-04-03
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 4/19/2024.
2024-03-27
Waiver of right of respondent District of Columbia to respond filed.
Main DocumentMain Document
2024-03-27
Brief amici curiae of Council of Parent Attorneys and Advocates filed.
Main DocumentProof of ServiceCertificate of Word CountMain DocumentProof of ServiceCertificate of Word Count
2024-02-22
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due March 28, 2024)
PetitionCertificate of Word CountProof of ServicePetitionCertificate of Word CountProof of Service
2023-12-18
Application (23A561) granted by The Chief Justice extending the time to file until February 23, 2024.
2023-12-14
Application (23A561) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from December 26, 2023 to February 23, 2024, submitted to The Chief Justice.
Main DocumentProof of ServiceMain DocumentProof of Service

Attorneys

Anne Davis, on Behalf of Braeden Davis
Roman Martinez V — Latham & Watkins, LLP, Petitioner
Council of Parent Attorneys and Advocates
Selene Almazan-Altobelli — Council of Parent Attorneys and Advocates, Amicus
District of Columbia
Caroline Sage Van Zile — Office of the Attorney General for D.C., Respondent
Sonya Ludmilla Lebsack — Office of the Attorney General, Dist. of Columbia, Respondent