No. 23-899

Iftikar Ahmed v. Oak Management Corporation

Lower Court: Connecticut
Docketed: 2024-02-21
Status: Denied
Type: Paid
Experienced Counsel
Tags: arbitration arbitration-doctrine civil-procedure court-proceedings damages-award degen-v-united-states federal-arbitration-act fugitive-disentitlement inherent-powers judicial-power
Latest Conference: 2024-05-09
Question Presented (from Petition)

1. Under the Federal Arbitration Act, ("FAA"), 9 U.S.C. § 10(a)(4), does an arbitrator "exceed[] [his] powers" by applying the fugitive disentitlement doctrine to disentitle a party who is a fugitive from a federal court proceeding, given the doctrine is an inherent power possessed only by courts?

2. Under the FAA, if an arbitrator may permissibly apply the fugitive disentitlement doctrine to protect a federal court's proceedings, does his failure to comply with the limitations this Court set forth in Degen v. United States and other caselaw on the doctrine constitute a violation of 9 U.S.C. § 10(a)(3), (a)(4), or public policy?

Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether an arbitrator may apply the fugitive disentitlement doctrine

Docket Entries

2024-05-13
Petition DENIED.
2024-04-23
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 5/9/2024.
2024-04-19
Reply of petitioner Iftikar Ahmed filed. (Distributed)
2024-04-09
Brief of respondent Oak Management Corporation in opposition filed.
2024-03-01
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including April 22, 2024.
2024-02-29
Motion to extend the time to file a response from March 22, 2024 to April 22, 2024, submitted to The Clerk.
2024-02-14
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due March 22, 2024)
2024-01-09
Application (23A630) granted by Justice Sotomayor extending the time to file until February 14, 2024.
2024-01-05
Application (23A630) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from January 15, 2024 to February 14, 2024, submitted to Justice Sotomayor.

Attorneys

Iftikar Ahmed
Gregory Jacob DubinskyHolwell Shuster & Goldberg, LLP, Petitioner
Oak Management Corporation
Michael B. KimberlyMcDermott Will & Emery LLP, Respondent