No. 23-898
Response Waived
Tags: burden-of-proof counsel criminal-procedure defendant due-process habeas-corpus ineffective-assistance-of-counsel legal-harm sixth-amendment
Latest Conference:
2024-03-22
Question Presented (from Petition)
Did the Wisconsin Supreme Court err by Denying-without-response (App.23) RYAN's 2023AP769 [5/12/2023 Petition For Review] and issuing no response (App.25) to his 2023AP769 [10/11/2023 Petition For Review]?
Question Presented (AI Summary)
When a defendant is harmed from Ineffective Assistance of Counsel, what is the appropriate burden of proof needed to correct this harm?
Docket Entries
2024-03-25
Petition DENIED.
2024-03-06
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 3/22/2024.
2024-02-27
Waiver of right of respondent Wisconsin to respond filed.
2024-01-16
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due March 22, 2024)
2023-10-04
Application (23A294) granted by Justice Barrett extending the time to file until January 14, 2024.
2023-09-13
Application (23A294) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from November 15, 2023 to January 14, 2024, submitted to Justice Barrett.
Attorneys
Ryan Thornton
Ryan Thornton — Petitioner
Wisconsin
John Arthur Blimling — Wisconsin Department of Justice, Respondent