No. 23-871

Lotus Vaping Technologies, LLC v. Food and Drug Administration

Lower Court: Ninth Circuit
Docketed: 2024-02-13
Status: Denied
Type: Paid
Amici (2)Relisted (4) Experienced Counsel
Tags: administrative-procedure-act arbitrary-and-capricious circuit-split comparative-efficacy electronic-nicotine-delivery-systems fair-warning flavored-products food-and-drug-administration marketing-applications
Latest Conference: 2025-04-17 (distributed 4 times)
Question Presented (from Petition)

Whether FDA's denial of Petitioner's marketing applications for flavored ENDS was arbitrary and capricious where FDA based the denial solely on a previously unannounced requirement for certain types of studies and where FDA ignored other evidence in the applications that FDA previously said was "critical" for marketing authorization.

Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether FDA's denial of Petitioner's marketing applications for flavored ENDS was arbitrary and capricious

Docket Entries

2025-04-21
Petition DENIED.
2025-04-14
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 4/17/2025.
2024-06-28
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 7/1/2024.
2024-06-04
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 6/20/2024.
2024-05-07
2024-05-06
Rescheduled.
2024-04-30
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 5/16/2024.
2024-04-15
Brief for Food and Drug Administration filed.
2024-03-14
2024-03-11
2024-02-16
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including April 15, 2024.
2024-02-15
Motion to extend the time to file a response from March 14, 2024 to April 15, 2024, submitted to The Clerk.
2024-02-09
2023-12-05
Application (23A507) granted by Justice Kagan extending the time to file until February 11, 2024.
2023-12-01
Application (23A507) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from December 13, 2023 to February 11, 2024, submitted to Justice Kagan.

Attorneys

Lotus Vaping Technologies, LLC
Eric N. HeyerThompson Hine LLP, Petitioner
United States Food and Drug Administration
D. John SauerSolicitor General, Respondent
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Respondent
Sarah M. HarrisActing Solicitor General, Respondent
Vaping Industry Stakeholders
J. Gregory TroutmanTroutman Law Office, PLLC., Amicus
Washington Legal Foundation
John Mercer Masslon IIWashington Legal Foundation, Amicus