1. Whether HBH (concealing its family rela
tionship with the adverse party in the
underlying probate litigation) violated
Petitioner's constitutional rights to freely
associate and make contracts with con
flict-free counsel, depriving Petitioner of
due process and access to the courts?

2. Whether the Ninth Circuit's pre-screen
ing regime —vesting staff attorneys with
exclusive authority to adjudicate "pro se"
appeals —deprived Petitioner of his con
stitutional and federal statutory rights to
appellate review by Article III judges, im
properly favoring Respondents, requiring
reversal?

3. Whether, due to egregious legal errors
and due process violations, this case war
rants summary reversal?

Whether HBH's concealment of its family relationship with the adverse party violated the petitioner's constitutional rights to freely associate and make contracts with conflict-free counsel, depriving the petitioner of due process and access to the courts