No. 23-850
Lucinda Jones v. David W. McKeague, Senior Judge, United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit, et al.
Response Waived
Tags: appellate-review civil-procedure civil-rights declaratory-judgment-act due-process due-process-claim federal-statute judicial-review jurisdiction non-merit-claim standing
Latest Conference:
2024-03-22
Question Presented (from Petition)
I. Does the Declaratory Act of 28 U.S.C. § 2201 afford jurisdiction over non-merit claims for due process violations?
II. Does 28 U.S.C. § 2201 compel district court judges to make findings of fact and conclusions of the law in non-merit cases, where facts are material to awarding sanctions, and are appellate court judges compelled to review the record to determine whether or not to support the trial court's ruling?
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Does the Declaratory Act of 28 U.S.C. § 2201 afford jurisdiction over non-merit claims for due-process-violations?
Docket Entries
2024-03-25
Petition DENIED.
2024-03-06
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 3/22/2024.
2024-02-27
Waiver of right of respondent Judge David W. McKeague, et al. to respond filed.
2024-02-05
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due March 8, 2024)
Attorneys
Judge David W. McKeague, et al.
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Respondent
Lucinda Jones
Lucinda Jones — Lucinda Jones, Attorney at Law, Petitioner