No. 23-85
James Giehl v. Bank of America
Tags: 18-U.S.C.-Sec.-242 4th-amendment civil-case civil-rights color-of-law foreclosure-process fourth-amendment judicial-misconduct void-decision void-decisions
Key Terms:
JusticiabilityDoctri
JusticiabilityDoctri
Latest Conference:
2023-10-06
Question Presented (from Petition)
1) Do Florida Judges have the ability to depart from a person's 4th Amendment Rights and violate the "color of law" (18 U.S.C. Sec. 242) code to avoid correcting known void decisions within a civil case.
2) Can known misconduct performed by the Florida State Courts be allowed to erode the public trust placed within the courts, the Florida foreclosure process, and establish illegal case law without the important check and balances provided by the U.S. Supreme Court.
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Do Florida Judges have the ability to depart from a person's 4th-Amendment-Rights and violate the 'color-of-law-18-U.S.C.-Sec.-242 code to avoid correcting known void decisions within a civil case
Docket Entries
2023-10-10
Petition DENIED.
2023-09-13
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/6/2023.
2023-03-04
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due August 28, 2023)
Attorneys
James Giehl
James Giehl — Petitioner