1. Can each individual of the three federal prosecutors,
to ensure that their government branch recognizes the
limits of its own power by presenting to the Honorable
Court their individual original "Written, signed AUTHOR
ITY by the SOT, Mr. John W. Snow (dated between April,
14-18,2006), to further prosecute each individual listed
IRS violations included in the federal grand jury Indict
ment " Counts 1-45, based on Title 26, Section 7206(2) &
(1), April 14,2006?

2. There are clear & fair processes for enforcing the law
to reach a clear resolve, liquidation settlement, whereby
if any individual of the three federal prosecutors fails to
present the original said "AUTHORITY " to the Honorable
Court, thus showing the Plaintiffs Constitutional Rights
of the 1st, 4th, 5th, 8th & 14th Amendments have been violat
ed then redress 's by the four co-defendants are required
to be paid tax-free to the Plaintiff 's Trust (LOUIS WAYNE
RATFIELD TRUST), within 30 days of the Courts Order?

3. In said BIVEN 'S case, not analogous to Section 1983,
concerning IRS alleged violations, is there any "absolute
prosecutorial immunity " for fraudulent activity by the
same three federal prosecutors, since IRS is not "state "
with nothing to do with 42 USC, Sec. 1983 (state), as the
lower Courts would like us to believe?

4. What US Statute gives "AUTHORITY " to the bias Unit
ed States District Court judge to convert a BIVEN'S claim
to one under 42 USC, Sec. 1983?

5. What US Statute gives "AUTHORITY " to the bias Unit
ed States District Court judge to issue an Order to help
his lying federal prosecutor in a case that has been clos
ed for almost a year?

6. What US Statute gives "AUTHORITY " to a bias Unit
ed States judge to quote in the judge 's opinion that said
civil complaint does not state a legally cognizable claim
for relief - is frivolous, whereby he must dismiss "without
prejudice " yet the bias judge dismissed "with prejudice "?

7. Is Judge MIDDLEBROOKS stating by dismissing "with
prejudice " that the claim is an actual legally cognizable
claim?

8. What US Statute gives "AUTHORITY " to the bias Unit
ed States judge to change a Biven' s case with fraudulent
activity under color of law by the three rogue federal pro
secutors with no statute of limitations into a state 1983
case giving said three rogue federal prosecutors absolute
immunity?

9. What US Statute gives "AUTHORITY "to United States
District Court Judge to sign the arrest warrant while not
following the procedures contained in the USSC opinion
in U. S. v. LaSalle National Bank (No 77-365, June 19,
1978(a) "Congress...created a tax enforcement system...
& any limitation on the good faith use of an IRS summons
must reflect the statutory premise "?

10. How did the egregious fraudulent actions of the three
bogus federal prosecutors in the prosecution of multiple
alleged individual IRS

Can each individual federal prosecutor present their written authority to prosecute?