No. 23-842
Patricia Polanco, et al. v. Ralph Diaz, et al.
Tags: civil-procedure civil-rights constitutional-law due-process government-liability immunity judicial-doctrine law-enforcement legal-standard qualified-immunity standing
Latest Conference:
2024-05-09
Related Cases:
23-722
(Vide)
Question Presented (from Petition)
Whether the Court should reverse or recalibrate the doctrine of qualified immunity.
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the Court should reverse or recalibrate the doctrine of qualified immunity
Docket Entries
2024-05-13
Petition DENIED.
2024-04-23
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 5/9/2024.
2024-04-22
Reply of petitioners Patricia Polanco, et al. filed. (Distributed)
2024-04-08
Brief of respondents Ralph Diaz, et al. in opposition filed.
2024-03-06
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including April 8, 2024.
2024-03-05
Motion to extend the time to file a response from March 8, 2024 to April 8, 2024, submitted to The Clerk.
2024-02-02
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due March 8, 2024)
Attorneys
Patricia Polanco, et al.
Paul Whitfield Hughes — McDermott Will & Emery, Petitioner
Ralph Diaz, et al.
Christopher David Hu — California Department of Justice, Respondent