Michelle Smith v. Peter B. Krupp, Judge, Superior Court of Massachusetts, Norfolk County, et al.
1. Whether the Rooker Feldman Doctrine was intended to shield Defendants; in a Title 42 section 1983 claim, in immunity for their actions of fraudulently initiating and harmfully conducting State Court proceedings with a Want of Jurisdiction and Usurpation of Power?
2. Whether the Rooker Feldman Doctrine applies to cases where the Petitioner alleged that a "Fraud of the Court " was perpetrated on the court, by Respondents French, Pinheiro, and Bigley?
3. Whether the Rooker Feldman Doctrine applies to this independent claim in Federal Court where the Petitioner seeks redress, not for a State Court Judgment that has been paid, but rather for the injuries inflicted by the MA State Court Proceedings that constituted Want of Juris diction and a Subversion of Congress / State?
Whether the Rooker Feldman Doctrine was intended to shield Defendants in a Title 42 section 1983 claim, in immunity for their actions of fraudulently initiating and harmfully conducting State Court proceedings with a Want of Jurisdiction and Usurpation of Power?