No. 23-80

Jeffrey Laydon, Individually and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated v. Cooperatieve Rabobank U.A., et al.

Lower Court: Second Circuit
Docketed: 2023-07-27
Status: Denied
Type: Paid
Amici (3) Experienced Counsel
Tags: circuit-split civil-procedure domestic-application extraterritorial-application extraterritoriality federal-commodities federal-securities judicial-interpretation legal-precedent precedent statutory-focus statutory-interpretation
Latest Conference: 2023-09-26
Question Presented (from Petition)

Whether, to decide if a claim involves a domestic application of a statute, courts may consider factors other than whether the conduct relevant to the statute's focus occurred in the United States.

Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether courts may consider factors other than the statute's focus to decide if a claim involves a domestic application

Docket Entries

2023-10-02
Petition DENIED.
2023-08-30
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/26/2023.
2023-08-29
Reply of petitioner Jeffrey Laydon on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated filed. (Distributed)
2023-08-28
2023-08-28
2023-08-28
Brief amici curiae of Better Markets, Inc., et al. filed. (Distributed)
2023-08-14
Brief of respondents UBS AG and UBS Securities Japan Co., Ltd. in opposition filed.
2023-07-24
2023-05-18
Application (22A1003) granted by Justice Sotomayor extending the time to file until July 24, 2023.
2023-05-16
Application (22A1003) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from May 25, 2023 to July 24, 2023, submitted to Justice Sotomayor.

Attorneys

Andrea Corcoran
Joseph Carl CecereCecere, PC, Amicus
Better Markets, Inc., Consumer Federation of America, and the Institute for Agriculture and Trade Policy
Times WangNorth River Law PLLC, Amicus
Jeffrey Laydon on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated
Kevin K. RussellGoldstein, Russell & Woofter LLC, Petitioner
Toshiba Corporation
Paul F. EnzinnaEllerman Enzinna Levy PLLC, Amicus
UBS AG and UBS Securities Japan Co., Ltd.
Thomas G. HungarGibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLP, Respondent