No. 23-794
John Pacilio and Edward Bases v. United States
Response Waived
Experienced Counsel
Tags: 2nd-amendment 35-usc-101 brown-vs-board civil-rights commodities-trading criminal-liability dodd-frank due-process fraud-statutes free-speech prosecutorial-discretion spoofing
Latest Conference:
2024-03-01
Question Presented (from Petition)
The question presented is whether spoofing violates the federal fraud statutes where a trader places a genuine, valid, fully executable order.
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether spoofing violates the federal fraud statutes where a trader places a genuine, valid, fully executable order
Docket Entries
2024-03-04
Petition DENIED.
2024-02-14
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 3/1/2024.
2024-02-08
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2024-01-22
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due February 23, 2024)
Attorneys
Edward Bases
Roman Martinez V — Latham & Watkins, LLP, Petitioner
Michael Andrew Clemente — Latham & Watkins LLP, Petitioner
John Pacilio
Robert Mark Loeb — Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLP, Petitioner
United States
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent