Petitioner 's prayed reliefs were
National importance of having the US
Supreme Court decide or conflict with
USSC ruling, or importance of similarly
situated over millions of citizens or the first
impression is raised at USSC.

ii) Petitioners ' property rights under 42USC§
1982 and Hindu Successive Act were denied
when USSC ruled in
Sullivan v. Little Hunting Park, Inc., 396
US 229-S.Ct 1969@ 237
"Section 1982 f42 USC §19821 covers the
right "to inherit, purchase, lease, sell . hold,
and convey real and personal property. "

iii) Local Govts/Foreign Govt violating,
Parents rights (14th amendment) which were
ruled by USSC under Troxel v. Granville.
530 US 57 and Washington v. Glucksberg,
521 US 702, 720.

iv) Local Govts illegally taken away Petitioners
property without Jury trial.

v) Local Govts illegally issued arrestfedl
warrant without Jury trial.

vi) NJ Court violated the Indian Family Court
Order

Whether the Supreme Court should grant certiorari to address the issues of national importance, property-rights, parental-rights, due-process, takings, and civil-procedure raised in the petition