oft. *4He VliqhesP Couftd iie\/ietOed)
<4V)6 eoU(2e *>eco£el auc( - {AAedt 4o w \z.e ^ppl < c fHj&hAS esArdbUsherf bif a p>QepD/ode(LiTOe oP ^be es/ideocz.
HbfipP Ue \MP& doos^ucVu/e ~±>e.&\e6t o-P Counjs&l
i/o ^e eiiUftfi pfc©C4gdJ)0q$ ( due 4o A 6iW/of .ftijcfl uti$e\Je\op
£eCOW$ , ^-Mncdr T2SSuV\e& AiP i(2-^ A*a$ 0/0 Apps&i

2),"b 'diok. 4he "Sd^le Couchs i^ejeeitaP, oveR.lootfect
09- \q»io£jaS 4ppUc/Htff CUmk , uoWhoi^ a ^aaso/O pe. eccplmf^,
prejudicial hmn AS (lotiUm^ to o(i i/WoLof fto u/o(teA2>ofl&te
AppUcuiktf at ^WP W), due to Ufoe Okie Cou/di Qbl'iqMrf
'uudle^ \&c* Code. C/um. PW j A-wu, jdjaL , I *p aoc5 Bswofy v,

Whether the applicant was denied effective assistance of counsel in the appeal proceedings, due to the silent and undeveloped record that resulted therein and on appeal