Jesus M. Romero, Sr. v. BronxCare HealthCare System, et al.
the Icmter fed&al court ftrwr\ <\s, 0<5 P/Sfncf
06</ / l (
oift 6*0 Ci/ZJjit Court in ]0)tv) fot'K fhtei fo f£C°c^\>?-£
f^otfcill Could'-l*i products, Sudo<\C { tmsfls, or face cover'mS
11 under flu/l stdiAt/flfcp
d, Coerced , or forced
d.m fo Td\e 2\ [)5 C SuioSecfon PCObhhSc\re c\
I (
<J qcco^ 1 On m^o(\t*3l
Q) floeS Alp Mnorode 05 Supreme Court fulh <xc\/;hotAjlrdae
tVi tKe. <Cp£ id <*n. tjoekded, pm^uerdmenfl unkiyful
ogenev, Ad i/oted fo qdet these fly A (fvld~l°\ proMsets,
Gfitdpflrf ip f-xbrf fwenfs/cWiWtn Skd ; flour
]t\Jvt\cHm 5 fvt^nmted / me mmy minor son, use 11 J>e denied
services ^ orAssdid visits, by flrcmUre dostuM '
the. fl>rorY t /l/y \i n
(Ids (a/U j^Utd evidence, or wHodflf, does &on6vz
nQ^p,- Vwv nw> iu CoerCC l*d'.q<'<Ws fo fvt dC\<A /mjff iw \tft \\>sut *a r(5^ to pc Gst c\ccoA/tj
Question not identified.