No. 23-7813
John Ragin v. Chadwick Dotson, Director, Virginia Department of Corrections, et al.
IFP
Tags: administrative-law brady-violation constitutional-law due-process exculpatory-evidence ineffective-assistance-of-counsel judicial-review legal-procedure precedent prosecutorial-misconduct right-to-a-fair-trial statutory-interpretation
Key Terms:
SocialSecurity Securities
SocialSecurity Securities
Latest Conference:
2024-09-30
Question Presented (from Petition)
Question not identified.
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Question not identified
Docket Entries
2024-10-07
The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis is denied, and the petition for a writ of certiorari is dismissed. See Rule 39.8. As the petitioner has repeatedly abused this Court's process, the Clerk is directed not to accept any further petitions in noncriminal matters from petitioner unless the docketing fee required by Rule 38(a) is paid and the petition is submitted in compliance with Rule 33.1. See Martin v. District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 506 U. S. 1 (1992) (per curiam).
2024-08-08
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/30/2024.
2024-05-23
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due July 29, 2024)
Attorneys
John Ragin
John M. Ragin — Petitioner