1) Whether a Judge abuses his/her discretion when there is a determination that post-sentencing rehabilitative efforts are evidence of an attempt to deceive the district court and thereby become a militating factor to 18 USC § 3553(a) which is then used rather than a mitigating factor per upward departure from the applicable guidelines range; and whether this circumstance violates a defendant's substantive rights.

2) Whether a prosecutor commits a Breach of the Plea Agreement by remaining silent when the district court upwardly departs from the sentencing range that the Government has bound itself to recommend in the Plea Agreement; or whether the Government has a duty to object to the upward departure in such a circumstance.

3) Whether the US Postal Service delays have now rendered Federal Prisoner's Electronic Filing of Court documents and/or the Internet lack of access to (for such) Unconstitutional for Lack of Access to the Courts.

Whether a Judge Abuses his/her discretion when there is a determination that post-sentencing rehabilitative efforts are evidence of an attempt to deceive the district court and thereby become a militating factor, rather than a mitigating factor per 18 USC § 3553(a) which is then used to justify an upward departure from the applicable guidelines range; and whether this circumstance violates a defendant's substantive rights