DID THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA, BY DE
CLINING JURISDICTION IN THIS CASE:

1. INVALIDATE THE LAW ITSELF WHEN IT DID
NOT ASSUME MANDATORY JURISDICTION, AS
MANDATED BY THE FLORIDA CONSTITUTION,
AND FLORIDA STATUTES ON APPELLATE PRO
CEDURE?

2. CONDONE THE INVALIDATION OF FLORIDA
STATUTE BY THE 4TH DCA, WHICH DISMISSED
MY APPEAL ON A MOTION TO DISMISS, WHICH
IN EFFECT MAKES OUR APPELLATE PROCESS
NULL AND VOID?

3. CONDONE THE 4TH DCA NOT ASKING THE
APPELLEES FOR AN ANSWER BRIEF PRIOR TO
DISMISSING MY APPEAL, WHICH IN EFFECT
AIDED AND ABETTED FRAUD IN THIS CASE, AS
OUTLINED IN MY INITIAL BRIEF TO THE 4TH
DCA?

Did the Supreme Court of Florida invalidate the law itself when it did not assume mandatory jurisdiction?