Whether the 3 Wardens ' had a, meeting of the minds decided the fate of the Petitioner's issued retaliatory ordered .to their entire WCI Department
against him to 'do whatever necessary to stopped his civil lawsuit Smith
v. Erickson et al then authorized, directed, participated, and condone.ih
his brutal discriminative mistreatments under the First, Fourth, Eighth,,
as well the Fourteenth Amendment. . The Petitioner's presented overwhelming
preponderance of the evidence that supported materials issues of factual
allegations .

Whether Respondents' breached DOC permanent sworned signed contract inadh-
ered to ministerial act in the'treatments of the Petitioner's discrimin^
atively abused their power and authority to, engaged in conspiracy retal iatory ordered misconducts against him carried out by issuing falsed, un-
'•? reliable, untrustworthy Conduct reports. Presented overwhelmin prepond
erance of the evidence under the. First, Fifth, and the Fourteenth Amend
ment supported materials issues of factual allegations.

Whether Respondents' breahed.DOC permanent sworned signed contract abused
power and authority failed to adhered ministerial acts released dangerous
inmates-prisoners ' from cell's aware of the physical brutal violent attack
ed and assaulted on the Petitioner's life stood watch without intervening
duration of\2 minutes before radio assistance just to carried out the 3 wardes ' retaliatory ordered against him couple with issuing falsed, Unrel
iable, and untrustworthy Conduct report. Presented overwhelming prepond
erance of the evidence under the First, Fifth, Eighth, and Fourteenth Amend
ment, supported materials issues of factual allegations.

Whether Respondents '■ breached DOC permanent sworned signed contract deli
berately recklessly;.indif f erently inadhered to their owti ministerial acts
in the denial of emergency 1 healthcare treatment to carried out conspiracy
ordered to realiated against Petitioner's for the exercise, of civil or ; constitutional rights under the First,, Eighth, and Fourteenth Amendment.
Presented overwhelming preponderance of the evidence that supported mat
erials issues of factual allegations.

Whether Respondents' breached DOC permanent sworned signed contract abused
power and authority inadhered to own ministerial act in the denial of pro
ceeding due process and due process hearings for minors as well majors
falsed, unreliable, Untrustworthy Conduct reports under the First, Fifth,
Presented overwhelming preponderance of the and Fourteenth Amendment,
evidence that supported material issues of factual allegations.

Whether Respondents ' breached DOC permanent Sworned signed contract delib
erately recklessly and indifferently inadhered to their own ministerial
acts in releasing private medical information to the 3. wardens' used to
carried out conspiracy retaliatory ordered against the Petitioner's that-
endangered his life as well-as'others removed from medical permanent rest rictions prescribed by PSU doctors, under the First, Fifth, Eighth, and
Presented overwhelming preponderance of the evidence Fourteenth Amendment, that supported material issues of factual allegation.

Whether Respondents' breached DOC permanent sworned signed contract abused
power

Retaliation-against-civil-rights-lawsuit