I. Does an external consultant retained by a state or local government qualify as a government "agent" subject to prosecution under 18 U.S.C. § 666 where the consultant lacks authority to act with respect to the entity's funds?

II. Is the government free to convict a public official of quid pro quo bribery without having to show that the defendant engaged in an official act? Put differently, is any "act" by a public official sufficient quo to convict under 18 U.S.C. § 666 or, as with other federal bribery laws, must the government establish that the official accepted payment in exchange for an "official act"?

Does an external consultant qualify as a government agent under 18-usc-666