Petitioner Raised Two Claims Of Ineffectiveness Of Trial Counsel For His Performance In Failing Ask A Pivotal Question And Not Providing Corrected Witnesses To Stand As Vee And Agreed, Contractually Binding This Breached Contract, And One Ineffective Claim On Appeal Counsel For Failing To Secure The Claims Peripherally To Pursue Of State Kavages.

Petitioner Also Presents Criticism Upon The Novelty Of On The Prosecution For Swearing The Bundwr Of Your On Cases Even If Shadow Of Resp Siz Liability Of The Decently. And Novelty, Certified As A Layperson Of The Law Gees As Attempted Perennial Exhaustion Sev Deferrity, However, The Direction How Shawley Provided New Exact Time Of Lemey.

The Question Present By Is May The Court Please Perform Its Independent Findings In Ruling On The Constitutionality Then Canons Per Gien. Guar, Does Rational Due Process The Opportunity In Lemential Exhaustion Of The State Level Of The Erayy Vievation Qcoeurey In Defense D?

Question not identified.