No. 23-7719
Justin T. Winston v. Jon Noble, Warden
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: cause-and-prejudice constitutional-rights constitutional-violations federal-claims postconviction-motion procedural-default state-law wisconsin-law
Latest Conference:
2024-09-30
Question Presented (from Petition)
Did Mr. Winston procedurally default all of his federal claims?
If Mr. Winston defaulted his claims, did he show cause and prejudice?
Did the Wisconsin Court of Appeals adopt federal law and then poorly disguise the law as a question of state law, for a postconviction motion, alleging federal constitutional violations?
Did Mr.. Winston make a substantial showing of the denial of his constitutional rights to receive a COA?
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Did Mr. Winston procedurally default all of his federal claims?
Docket Entries
2024-10-07
Petition DENIED.
2024-07-18
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/30/2024.
2024-07-15
Waiver of Jon Noble of right to respond submitted.
2024-07-15
Waiver of right of respondent Jon Noble to respond filed.
2024-06-05
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due July 15, 2024)
Attorneys
Jon Noble
Sarah Lynn Burgundy — Wisconsin Department of Justice, Respondent
Justin T. Winston
Jusin T. Winston — Petitioner