It is a public record that petitioner is the only taxpayer in New Mexico who was deprived of property but denied due process evidentiary hearing when respondent allegedly perjured herself more than ten times and eliminated petitioner's evidentiary hearing.

Question 1 presented is: whether, in the face of the facts alleged in the complaint and therefore admitted by the motion to dismiss, the Tenth Circuit's ruling which rejected a person has a right to a due process evidentiary hearing is in conflict with the Due Process and Equal Protection Clauses of the Constitution.

Question 2 presented is: whether, in the face of the facts alleged in the complaint and therefore admitted by the motion to dismiss, the Tenth Circuit's ruling which rejected Oklahoma Press as a valid standard for compulsory production claim is in conflict with "reasonableness" standard of the Fourth Amendment of the Constitution.

Question 3 presented is: whether a court sua sponte changing the text of a New Mexico statute and issuing a decision on the court-modified non-existing statutory text is in direct conflict with the United States and New Mexico Constitutions.

Whether the Tenth Circuit's ruling rejecting a person's right to a due process evidentiary hearing conflicts with the Due Process and Equal Protection Clauses