No. 23-7657

Leslie Willis v. PNC Financial Services Group Inc., et al.

Lower Court: Third Circuit
Docketed: 2024-06-07
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
Relisted (2)IFP
Tags: due-process due-process,14th-amendment,judicial-misconduct,bia equal-protection fourteenth-amendment judicial-disqualification judicial-misconduct lgbtq-rights
Latest Conference: 2024-12-06 (distributed 2 times)
Question Presented (from Petition)

A. QUESTION PRESENTED: Whether there is an ongoing
violation of Fourteenth Amendment due process rights under
the Constitution of the United States, an unfair tribunal, and
an appearance of partiality, where The Honorable President of
the United States, Joseph R. Biden, Jr., apparently, in support
ofhighly controversial and political LBGTQ agenda,
commanded the appointment of a Judge, who is a member of
the LBGTQ community, who presides (or presided) on a three-
Judge Panel, in Circuit Court proceedings, for a private
citizen 's Appeals; and where the Judge sat on a Panel which
denied a Motion for his or her own Disqualification; and
whether the Judge must disqualify from the Appeals.

B. QUESTION PRESENTED: Whether the Court of Appeals for
the Third Circuit sanctioned a pervasive judicial misconduct,
bias and prejudice in affirming a District Judge and Magistrate
Judge refusal to disqualify from Court proceedings upon a
Motion for judicial Disqualification/Recusal in accordance with
28 U.S. Code § 144 and 28 U.S. Code § 455 (involving a
Magistrate Judge extrajudicial affiliation with the American
Bar association social-political agenda in support of the LBGTQ
community and LBGTQ rights! and where a District Judge
sanctioned the misconduct); and in an ongoing violation of
substantive and procedural Fourteenth Amendment Due
Process Clause, Petition Clause, and Equal Protection Clause
rights under the Constitution of the United States! and
whether the District Judge and Magistrate Judge must
disqualify.

C. QUESTION PRESENTED: Whether the Supreme Court should
promulgate a Fed. R. Civ. P. Rule 27(a) cause of Action for the
Perpetuation of Evidence concealed (e.g. Trust documents),
where most circuits, including the Third Circuit, do not provide
a Fed. R. Civ. P. Rule 27(a) cause of action for testimony
concealed but, rather, for Evidence lost, stolen, or destroyed
(Ash v. Cort 512 F.2d 909, 911 (3d Cir.1975)); and where the
Second Circuit provides a Fed. R. Civ. P. Rule 27 cause of action
to perpetuate testimony that is lost, concealed, or destroyed (In
re Petition of Yamaha Motor Corporation , U.S.A., 251 F.R.D. 97,
99 (N.D.N.Y. 2008)); AND Whether the Court of Appeals for the
Third Circuit and/or the District Court for the Western District
of Pennsylvania, should adjudicate the precise question, in a
Fed. R. Civ. P. Rule 27(a) Petition to Perpetuate Evidence, as to
whether Trust documents are concealed.

Question Presented (AI Summary)

Ongoing violation of Fourteenth Amendment due process rights,judicial-misconduct,bias-and-prejudice,disqualification,perpetuation-of-evidence,trust-documents

Docket Entries

2024-12-09
Rehearing DENIED. Justice Alito took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.
2024-11-13
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 12/6/2024.
2024-11-01
Petition for Rehearing filed.
2024-10-07
Petition DENIED. Justice Alito took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.
2024-07-18
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/30/2024.
2023-11-29
Application (23A456) granted by Justice Sotomayor extending the time to file until January 18, 2024.
2023-11-27
Application (23A457) granted by Justice Alito extending the time to file until March 2, 2024.
2023-11-21
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due July 8, 2024)
2023-11-07
Application (23A457) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from January 2, 2024 to March 2, 2024, submitted to Justice Alito.
2023-11-07
Application (23A456) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from November 19, 2023 to January 18, 2024, submitted to Justice Sotomayor. (Justice Alito is recused.)

Attorneys

Leslie Willis
Leslie Willis — Petitioner