No. 23-7618

Jesse A. Reynolds v. Titus County, Texas, et al.

Lower Court: Fifth Circuit
Docketed: 2024-06-03
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
Response WaivedRelisted (2)IFP
Tags: civil-rights due-process equal-protection fair-housing fair-housing-act judicial-immunity prosecutorial-immunity sovereign-immunity statute-of-limitations takings
Latest Conference: 2024-11-22 (distributed 2 times)
Question Presented (from Petition)

1. Is the Statute of Limitations tolled for being considered under the age of 18 or of
unsound mind, because of fraud; relevant to the opinion of the Supreme Court in
Hardin v. Straub ?

2. Does Rule 60(b)(1 ) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure allow for a new trial for
a judges mistake/error of law, that deprives the 6th amendment right to a fair trial;
relevant to the opinion of the United States Supreme Court in Kemp v. United
States ?

3. Does the takings clause of the Fifth Amendment require local governments or
states to compensate for personal/estate damages by taking property or
deprivation of right to property; relevant to the 2nd, 5th, 6th, 8th, & 14th amendments,
and the opinion of the United States Supreme Court in Knick v. Township of Scott,
Pennsylvania & First English Evangelical Lutheran Church v. Los Angeles County?

4. Is Sovereign Immunity abrogated for discrimination under the Fair Housing
Act/religious discrimination clause; or if 14th amendment due process and equal
protection clauses have been deprived; relevant to the opinion of the United States
Supreme Court in Fitzpatrick vs. Bitzer, or if the rights secured by the 2nd, 4th, 5th,
6th, 8th, and 14th amendments and Castle Law have been deprived?

5. Is Judicial Immunity absolute n housing discrimination, religious discrimination or
fraud upon court has occurred for lawsuits filed in individual or official capacity; if
14th amendment due process and equal protection clauses have been violated
relevant to the opinion of the United States Supreme Court in Fitzpatrick vs. Bitzer?

6. Is Prosecutorial Immunity absolute if housing discrimination, religious discrimination
or fraud upon court has occurred for lawsuits filed in individual or official capacity; if
the 14th amendment due process and equal protection clauses have been violated
relevant to the opinion of the United States Supreme Court in Fitzpatrick vs. Bitzer?

Question Presented (AI Summary)

Question not identified.

Docket Entries

2024-11-25
Rehearing DENIED.
2024-11-06
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 11/22/2024.
2024-10-23
Petition for Rehearing filed.
2024-10-07
Petition DENIED.
2024-07-03
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/30/2024.
2024-07-01
Waiver of right of respondent Titus County, et al. to respond filed.
2024-05-28
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due July 3, 2024)

Attorneys

Jesse A. Reynolds
Jesse A. Reynolds — Petitioner
Titus County, et al.
David Ryan Herring IglesiasIglesias Law Firm, PLLC, Respondent