No. 23-7607

In Re Kurt A. Benshoof

Lower Court: N/A
Docketed: 2024-05-31
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
IFP
Tags: civil-rights domestic-relations-exception due-process federal-jurisdiction habeas-corpus judicial-proceedings parental-rights pro-se-rights unlawful-imprisonment
Latest Conference: 2024-06-20
Question Presented (from Petition)

Whether the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals decided an important federal question regarding domestic relations exception in a way that conflicts with relevant decisions of this Court, and thereby enabled the ongoing unlawful imprisonment of Petitioners, for which there is no plain, speedy, and adequate remedy at law other than a writ of habeas corpus from this Court.

Whether the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals sanctioned departures from the accepted and usual course of judicial proceedings by the U.S. District Court for the Western District of Washington, and thereby enabled the ongoing unlawful imprisonment of Petitioners, for which there is no plain, speedy, and adequate remedy at law other than a writ of habeas corpus from this Court.

Whether minors have pro se rights under 28 U.S.C. § 1654 that can be asserted by their parents on their behalf.

Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals decided an important federal question regarding domestic-relations-exception in a way that conflicts with relevant decisions of this Court, and thereby enabled the ongoing unlawful-imprisonment, for which there is no plain, speedy, and adequate remedy at law other than a writ-of-habeas-corpus from this Court

Docket Entries

2024-06-24
Petition DENIED.
2024-06-05
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 6/20/2024.
2024-04-30

Attorneys

In Re Kurt Benshoof
Kurt A. Benshoof — Petitioner