The brid' Court Lomenitted FRRUD On) THE COURT 4 when
The Cour f Change the Priel transeriptS of phe porobsen oO
li hedrad 46 Caonsel Len fekourecf and, jeen rashes Aes 2
Transaripks ouf fo cach Courtand the pebtoner Thus:
Violet Ae pebtronere: Sif finendnes de (PORES
fight fo GCavnse lof' cAalce Shen fetsinecf> ae o7epiny
fhe pebbiener frown Shower Vm Ae. fraud, hourl fail, -P heorl
Bies anel fhe SYf CLAN Ce of Zinpropreity Za pe n0fson
To witkdrecs as covasel ancl Threesh-ooF He proceeding Thos ;
also Vielatans fe pehtroners Four fees th Aoriancfrer?- dhe POS
Right ot Moe Consh tebren fo 4 Par trad proceediay uffer
STOP he petdrener frorr She tres Ars feasts for wanhrag a Mer hilfernay. y
ot Altectecl We Fromenork" of the pebitionec's dee prmess Ap of

Whether the court committed fraud on the court when it changed the trial transcripts of the petitioner's case without notice to counsel and the petitioner