WAS MS. DIGGS'S CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHT TO CONFRONTATION VIOLATED WHEN THE DISTRICT COURT ADMITTED RECORDED STATEMENTS OF UNAVAILABLE CODEFENDANTS INTO EVIDENCE OVER HER OBJECTION?

DID THE ADMISSION OF THE RECORDED STATEMENTS BY UNAVAILABLE CO-DEFENDANTS VIOLATE THIS COURT'S RULING IN BRUTON V. UNITED STATES, 391 U.S. 123(1968)?

DID THE FIFTH CIRCUIT ERR BY HOLDING THAT THE RECORDED STATEMENTS OF THE UNAVAILABLE CODEFENDANTS WERE NON TESTIMONIAL AND THUS NOT PROHIBITED BY THE CONFRONTATION CLAUSE?

Was Ms. Diggs's constitutional right to confrontation violated?