Manna Massaquoi v. Pennsylvania
1. Did the Pennsavenin Supreme Gul, ved in rot finding that the
FORA Contig Pennea\vanin ugenrov foot aed by nb grrnting
fequested VERS
2. Do Roce Fattioner née an ARlorney npowites 5 hs
United Sales Supreme Guid of Ainerica 4p adeq ues Ela
AINend this Terition qo" Crtiorari And or repre hime
2. Was Poptioners Prextoul Councelo WefECtNE for theffective
gesitionces |
up. (Nill vehitiner Anind of Supplithed this Fetition Upon his
\elersed with additiont nsvoly disesieved evidence, pnef
or vequed this Gut te erase allow him ehst pddettmal
reully Aixnjered evidence in the Ante Coutts >
Did the Pennsylvania Supreme Court err in finding that the FORA Consent Decree entered by the Pennsylvania Governor was not violated by the granting of the requested VERS?