Please help uS T The ComfnonweAlhh ©h !Aer\hucKy V\a$
ndophed aa unconshihuhioned pAhtern And pfAthic^ Allowing
Cour4 Appealed UvuyerS ho lolurh ©uh ho hhe Jury hh*h v/e nr^
ginlhy. CriminAl defendArvls Afe aIso loein^ refused Any And
aII <^i/es4i©ns hrom ©Ur jury *l^ PU3h &vc juries Aft permitted
ho ^ueshion aII S-tahe w»'hAeSSes. This cnse presets several
imporh-Anh AAdi 'oAwfde i$SUfc5. Also, hhis pehihon repre$enhs
AA ©pporhunihy hor hhe Supreme Courh ho provide clAfih»*CAhien
Afnon^sh hhe divided Circuit <?n wiry*!- cunsh'huhes AA
inhelli^enh And vclunhnry WAivec ©h con-flieh counsel, £[er\r\
Odom pfesenhs hhe <{ueshicn$ hhA-h hollow:our

(0 Does a criminal dehendAnh have a conshhidiertAl fi^hh ho holly
presenh himself/herself os a wihneSS. Xf hhe jury is permitted ho
^Utshion all shAhe's wihneSStS A^her hheif heS-hmeny should a Jury
he denied ho ^ueshton hht dehtndArh Ahher his/her heshimony
Wihhovh A Jushhied ftASOn «

{£) wh*h eXAthly eshAlolishes hhah dehe^se counsel ts ©perAk 'nj under a.
Cor^lfeh? Al*o,v/hen de&Aie cowv^el aSSerb ho a hrial courh hh«h he KaS a.
Conhh 'ch w»hh h»S cUenh/hht dehendAnh wh*h is A chfcAr line ©f
^ueshonln^ hrem hht courh he hhe UymAn dehendAnh And/or whah
ConShihuheS a Knowing And inhelli^enh WA»vtr oh eonhlieh counsel^

(3} T$ »h unconshhuhional her a dehense 1Awytr he hlurh ouh ho
A jury hhah the dehendanh only denies hwo(i) ©uh oh Si)C(0 C-hac-geS
A^Ainsh hht dehendanVs wishes \

(S') When a pro St dehendanh movnhs An ehjexhion during hrial
does ht have a Censhihuh 'cnal righh ho Attend hhe Wnch conherence
ho Arhvculahe Ws ©lojechiont

(s) t)»

Does a criminal defendant have a constitutional right to fully present himself / herself as a witness