No. 23-7569
Raymond Woodley v. North Carolina
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: conflict-of-interest criminal-procedure due-process ineffective-assistance multiple-representation sixth-amendment strickland-prejudice strickland-standard sullivan-standard trial-court
Latest Conference:
2024-09-30
Question Presented (from Petition)
When counsel alerts the trial court to a conflict of interest not involving multiple representation, and the trial court fails to resolve the conflict, is the defendant entitled to relief under the Sullivan standard upon a showing that the representation was adversely affected by the conflict, or must the defendant show Strickland prejudice?
Question Presented (AI Summary)
When counsel alerts the trial court to a conflict of interest not involving multiple representation, and the trial court fails to resolve the conflict, is the defendant entitled to relief under the Sullivan standard upon a showing that the representation was adversely affected by the conflict, or must the defendant show Strickland prejudice?
Docket Entries
2024-10-07
Petition DENIED.
2024-06-13
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/30/2024.
2024-06-05
Waiver of right of respondent North Carolina to respond filed.
2024-03-21
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due June 27, 2024)
2024-01-18
Application (23A659) granted by The Chief Justice extending the time to file until March 21, 2024.
2024-01-12
Application (23A659) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from January 21, 2024 to March 21, 2024, submitted to The Chief Justice.
Attorneys
North Carolina
Robert C. Montgomery — North Carolina Department of Justice, Respondent
Raymond Woodley
George Glenn Gerding — Office of the Appellate Defender, Petitioner