1. Whether this Honorable Court should grant certiorari to review whether the Sixth Circuit's determination that the uncorroborated and unreliable double hearsay statements of an unreliable confidential informant was sufficient evidence to support two sentencing enhancements which double Mr. Jackson's sentencing range.

Whether the Sixth Circuit's determination that uncorroborated and unreliable double hearsay statements of an unreliable confidential informant was sufficient evidence to support sentencing enhancements