ke/ft 5'ft^ft '^vft vft ft/\e. D
4fte Frye, S'Frdnrd 3uftft/ei£/iftft
SkoJd £j«s/wWftfA ^Me L*oe_ c»- WK l J-rec-'f kpfpAtdn
FzderjbUenee RJt 701^,'U /A o^BvU^ce
Rje 7° 2?Sk.obF (aIolS FrpFh Shdi
[ friWitr '€. (ASQ- ck(a.
\ \or i 5 CdiTn/ra-)
ft ctilo(x)<7cl ft QiUe.FsS'i'
evidence ftkoft deFnse Couo\Srl dors•r i/no/w as\dft h^ue. access do ft
opdrv'iOas'no i
I1 Fi eft 5 u k j eoft U e erperd mo\k (dou\
For r criWiArl ftrift/ ftC*A e iMicfiiACL
J-5 cr concl\Xs]or\ 0"P
-exAuStdr\ oftoA; a+ ftft ftftear-Ai hcMi sh O- ic mr e
/V.// l/£/ie
ift7 ococep'F.d 5o./ e a ft fti (i Oom ai ca/i /l"e 'A

Should Washington State use the Daubert standard for criminal trials, or is the Frye standard sufficient?