Did the united court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit review the full merits of the Videotape?

Did the united states Court of appeals error When it found use of force by petitioner was determined that force was used and Justified? Should the appeals court have reversed this, petitioner on matter on that fact alone?

Is the united States court of Appeals decision in conflict With the Owin case basis, Combs V. Wilkinson "23-5. Ed. Sde run u.s.b4 of the real facts that the use of force Committee completely determined that force Was employed against petitioner under O.A.C. Rule 330 "4-0Qi With the District failed do acknowledge So did the court Strike the real-facts of this repeat distinct on making this matter consistent with Combs V. Wilkinson?

Did the district court error by not addressing the evidence and material Within Petitioners motion for Summary Judgment?

This matter is Conflict With this United states Court decision In Scott-Wharris In light of the S.

Did the District court error by not addressing 2030-9-03 as provided by petitioner in whole within his motion for Summary Judgment that force Was affirmed against him Which would make clear of the so called unremarkable decision by the District Court?

Did the district court error by Stating that force was not used against petitioner for the entire matter but then Claiming that no force Was used against petitioner?

Will S United States Supreme Court exercise his Supervisory power and remit the real facts of the videotape and card, as Sanctioned by the court decision Scott-Wharris along With the real records and determination of the use of force reports under O.A.C. Rule 3400 "4-03? that was completely processed against Petitioner, that will make the unremarkable determination by the district Court for Petitioner?

Is the United States Court of Appeals decision consistent With the District court decision in 2ccqc Wmrd With regard to OAO 3030-9-03l in light of Fed.R.Evid.Evid.Evid.Evid. Ondn Ped-Cn*d to X2>?

Did the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit err in reviewing the full facts of the videotape and the use of force report by the committee that determined force was used and justified against the petitioner?