No. 23-7550

In Re Kinley MacDonald

Lower Court: N/A
Docketed: 2024-05-23
Status: Dismissed
Type: IFP
IFP
Tags: child-abuse due-process family-rights federal-review habeas-corpus hearsay ineffective-assistance jurisdiction post-conviction-relief protective-custody state-court-jurisdiction
Key Terms:
DueProcess HabeasCorpus Immigration
Latest Conference: 2024-06-13
Question Presented (from Petition)

Before we Court is of matter inveluirae Lnabused Children kra€icked rata aster Care by hearsay , Causiry, ierepairable. hacen, The motter SueCered expected AstresS ay CeSult., The DelendantS then used khat altstress to retToack vely jastrty initial removal) refusal *o reantOy, and Create an elaborate web of accusatianS +o torminate a family in absence of all jurisdiction Coe which whe Federal Cours' abstention SarcttonS Sucka departure ok human Craps eh the State Qourtrs' of Maing | that 1s alls for a hes perare plea ofa Mother to Aws Court's exercise of Supervisery pewer. Start to . Qosrsh! this Gese— THESE CAILOQEN Aeserve your time. "Thenle You,

DY Can a anal Qourt open and remove children in a "prescck ive, Cusredy "! Case based solely on hearsay aceut~ Abions groh: bitied by stale Statute in seeret p and in absence oF jurisdiction? a |

X) Can a tral Court threaten an Arstressed Mother with Quesler flecreaseh Contack with ber children tO Coes an * Rareement,! Aen. sea Den: Zi Me thet saree ~ men' into an admission af Qui le to Ohid @buse / Teplect= yriebont Cocks or turdence of ehid aduse / realede in that Gareement' oF else udhene ?

3) Con Debend enks Qreakee Systema barriers to effective assistance of counsel, aleny a Family opportunity of Mandated Colloq voy, revieuS, and appeal On issues oF abuse of process) jurisdiction, Ghaud won whe Court, abuse of diseredion, and wiicial miscendast +e Conc. & ermirnation of Parental Mans On a@ amily deprived : ob ake Curdamentally Cain opportunity Lo Pt gate, th Lacks on Court record 7

4) Cana shoe Cours of last cesorr declare a new Stand~ ard of reyiew Of evidence aqoinst a class af people pow PTSD/ depression so "propendurance of eurdence " shee Ae diagnosis iS, inand of jsell, "\eopardy +o OK\dren When she Supreme Coure has demanded ap Srate rebrain ftom a Presumption that a oalass of people are onic Parents (Stanley wv. Llinois yas OS. 64S Gse-S8 C1992) and requires "Clear and Convincing euidonce of abuse /nealect (CStantosky a ross, USS USL D4 ME-9) (193)?

$) Can aState Cours of last resort deny app cals /alempts oF a mother's pedresS of ta tral Court abuses) then echo these abuses fo limit and inhibit a Family'S Male to effeckive Counsel on Lira appeal; ordered cn a Morcey *o only Level What she deams Vewpor tant while else orderirne Moaker'g Counsel (VOT re Like. Con

Question Presented (AI Summary)

Can a trial court open and remove children in a 'protective custody' case based solely on hearsay about actions prohibited by state statute in secret proceedings and in absence of jurisdiction?

Docket Entries

2024-06-17
The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis is denied, and the petition for a writ of habeas corpus is dismissed. See Rule 39.8. As the petitioner has repeatedly abused this Court's process, the Clerk is directed not to accept any further petitions in noncriminal matters from petitioner unless the docketing fee required by Rule 38(a) is paid and the petition is submitted in compliance with Rule 33.1. See Martin v. District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 506 U. S. 1 (1992) (per curiam).
2024-05-29
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 6/13/2024.
2024-01-19

Attorneys

Kinley MacDonald
Kinley MacDonald — Petitioner