DueProcess HabeasCorpus Immigration
Before we Court is of matter inveluirae Lnabused Children kra€icked rata aster Care by hearsay , Causiry, ierepairable. hacen, The motter SueCered expected AstresS ay CeSult., The DelendantS then used khat altstress to retToack vely jastrty initial removal) refusal *o reantOy, and Create an elaborate web of accusatianS +o torminate a family in absence of all jurisdiction Coe which whe Federal Cours' abstention SarcttonS Sucka departure ok human Craps eh the State Qourtrs' of Maing | that 1s alls for a hes perare plea ofa Mother to Aws Court's exercise of Supervisery pewer. Start to . Qosrsh! this Gese— THESE CAILOQEN Aeserve your time. "Thenle You,
DY Can a anal Qourt open and remove children in a "prescck ive, Cusredy "! Case based solely on hearsay aceut~ Abions groh: bitied by stale Statute in seeret p and in absence oF jurisdiction? a |
X) Can a tral Court threaten an Arstressed Mother with Quesler flecreaseh Contack with ber children tO Coes an * Rareement,! Aen. sea Den: Zi Me thet saree ~ men' into an admission af Qui le to Ohid @buse / Teplect= yriebont Cocks or turdence of ehid aduse / realede in that Gareement' oF else udhene ?
3) Con Debend enks Qreakee Systema barriers to effective assistance of counsel, aleny a Family opportunity of Mandated Colloq voy, revieuS, and appeal On issues oF abuse of process) jurisdiction, Ghaud won whe Court, abuse of diseredion, and wiicial miscendast +e Conc. & ermirnation of Parental Mans On a@ amily deprived : ob ake Curdamentally Cain opportunity Lo Pt gate, th Lacks on Court record 7
4) Cana shoe Cours of last cesorr declare a new Stand~ ard of reyiew Of evidence aqoinst a class af people pow PTSD/ depression so "propendurance of eurdence " shee Ae diagnosis iS, inand of jsell, "\eopardy +o OK\dren When she Supreme Coure has demanded ap Srate rebrain ftom a Presumption that a oalass of people are onic Parents (Stanley wv. Llinois yas OS. 64S Gse-S8 C1992) and requires "Clear and Convincing euidonce of abuse /nealect (CStantosky a ross, USS USL D4 ME-9) (193)?
$) Can aState Cours of last resort deny app cals /alempts oF a mother's pedresS of ta tral Court abuses) then echo these abuses fo limit and inhibit a Family'S Male to effeckive Counsel on Lira appeal; ordered cn a Morcey *o only Level What she deams Vewpor tant while else orderirne Moaker'g Counsel (VOT re Like. Con
Can a trial court open and remove children in a 'protective custody' case based solely on hearsay about actions prohibited by state statute in secret proceedings and in absence of jurisdiction?