No. 23-7548

In Re Kinley MacDonald

Lower Court: N/A
Docketed: 2024-05-23
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
IFP
Tags: child-custody child-welfare civil-rights due-process family-law hearsay hearsay-evidence judicial-misconduct jurisdiction jurisdictional-challenge parental-rights state-statute
Latest Conference: 2024-09-30
Question Presented (from Petition)

1) Can a trial Court open and remove children in a "pre-adjudicative Custody" case based solely on hearsay accusations prohibited by State Statute and in absence of jurisdiction?

2) Can a trial Court threaten a distressed Mother with further decreased Contact with her children to coerce an "Agreement," when we Petition that agreement into an admission of guilt to Child abuse/Neglect without Locks of evidence of child abuse/neglect in that agreement or else adherence?

3) Can Defendants create systemic barriers to effect due assistance of counsel, deny a Family opportunity of mandated colleguey reviews, and appeal on issues of abuse of process, jurisdiction, fraud upon the Court, abuse of discretion, and judicial misconduct to force termination of parental Plans on a Family deprived of the Fundamentally Fair opportunity to litigate, the Locks on Court record?

4) Can a state Court of last resort declare a new Standard of review of evidence against a class of people dosh PTSD/depression to "preponderance of evidence" when the diagnosis is wand of itself, "jeopardy to children when the Supreme Court has demanded state refrain from a Presumption that a class of people are unfit Parents (Stanley v. Illinois, 405 U.S. 645, 651-58 (1972)) and requires "Clear and Convincing evidence of abuse/neglect (Stanley v. Kramer, 455 U.S. 745, 753-54 (1982))?

5) Can a State Court of last resort deny appeals/attempts of a mother's redress of trial Court abuses, then echo those abuses to limit and inhibit a Family's ability to effective counsel on oral appeal, order an attorney to only level let se deams Lavport ant while also ordering Mothers Counsel (NOT to cite Constitutional/Federal questions on a Noelenis heal of?

6) Can a United States District Court abstain when the State Court is causing irreparable harm to Fundamental Rights?

7) Can a United States District Court and or United States Court of Appeals objectively deny Course to a petitioner See Kira redress on a matter which requires Enjoyment of counsel prior to?

8) Can a United States District Court and for United States Court of Appeals have a Prison Litigation Reform Act requirements of a petitioner Simply because she is being detained in a juvenile?

9) Can a United States District Court and for United States Court of Appeals Require an indigent Plaintiff to pay legal Fees Under the Prison Litigation Reform Act when she is NOT pursuing action against the jail?

Question Presented (AI Summary)

Can a trial court open and remove children in a 'protective custody' case based solely on hearsay accusations prohibited by state statute and in absence of jurisdiction?

Docket Entries

2024-10-07
The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis is denied, and the petition for a writ of prohibition is dismissed. See Rule 39.8. As the petitioner has repeatedly abused this Court's process, the Clerk is directed not to accept any further petitions in noncriminal matters from petitioner unless the docketing fee required by Rule 38(a) is paid and the petition is submitted in compliance with Rule 33.1. See Martin v. District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 506 U. S. 1 (1992) (per curiam).
2024-07-11
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/30/2024.
2024-03-28
Petition for a writ of prohibition and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due June 24, 2024)

Attorneys

Kinley MacDonald
Kinley MacDonald — Petitioner