1) Whether it's Proper For the District court to Tawed and Cove ANd CaiWote-to Growed Pex Alors 40 Goppgrts Me Chem & GAC Facroul Lonocences and déry li he Claim OF CCA Inna CENCE S Cid Farsty Clad thCHr Petitioner didathave ony euidences of expect Lestnany He jury di drit Hear oF remote Ct edigiole wwhrithrne Penner I did Gub mitted With the 24 U.6-c 2954 ethan See: Appendix LR Luhich 1S expert WHkness OF.NiCOl Gnd DEOBement OF Foamy t Services Cuild Core experts WOES i GO OCS * Wwhd Mreruiewo on 4-at-a7 doving PHUS CO CKAMONEHON determined CkPer Findings Opinion COUSE OF the ViChims herein wn yori 28 WAS +e Previa sly cnoseged 908 PEC Cd Farmer Trica Counsel ChesH| ducing Ore-trint proceed ing s Which Who Wis Found Quilt} by expert Ov Tecnced UMRAO S1Od tricil Fordhis Ceime herein f but WOS Qiiowed +0 kestiey COC 4ne Sect Gt Avia CCCI Petiranecheccn jUCy AVIA LAAHSNE Sees Wha Case dISCAEA| idacuments were Amuted Cram Cecord Goprad record Skil i herein Which Awe exOeck OPINIGN Stared Ht Los LOIRSHA Beets 01-CF-067 Quid Nok the PetuTMer Wo Cammitted Anis Came?

2) Whe ther its proper Por the 05st Courtto dead O Certifr Care OF Cppeaiibiity when-the petihoner Cleawly Show Gnd proves i Gnd has ewdeaces oF Gctual Fyctyd sano lences thc _fo ouertym his Lonwechon ? see appendix

3) Whe thecsés propec or the Oistri(t Cows 40 use the tine bar to deay Certificate of Gpoeouibil'ty kyovinty tagt their ___|. irs clear nd bnquestion able evidences thatthe evidence 5 | the Site ah Thinois Seta Conuicted Petrorer hercin i wes punted by Detective Hucestep on ¥-d5- 07 OF the Wide recorded Child s Gdyacys Center ttrviews With the |! the Sakd Detechve Ond Victims 1h Wuhth the wich Cheusty tad | he Ootective then G6k thot the State Witness prevours ty | Cheayed suspect Ond Farmer trial counsel Chicnt Laiene | Seeks did Hus Crime Ghd not the Petitioner herein sce; nppen diXE* Forder the oherter Mucl

Whether the district court erred in denying the petitioner's motion for a new trial