No. 23-7537
Mike Austin Anderson v. United States
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: appeal criminal-procedure criminal-trial due-process judicial-procedure jury-instructions jury-verdict motion-to-revoke recusal-motion standard-of-review sufficiency-of-evidence
Latest Conference:
2024-09-30
Question Presented (from Petition)
1) Whether the district court erred by finding that the prosecution produced sufficient evidence at trial for a reasonable jury to return a guilty verdict against Mr. Anderson.
2) Whether the district court erred by denying Mr. Anderson's Motion to Revoke or Amend Magistrate Judge's Denial of Defendant's Motion to Order Recusal.
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the district court erred by finding that the prosecution produced sufficient evidence at trial for a reasonable jury to return a guilty verdict against Mr. Anderson
Docket Entries
2024-10-07
Petition DENIED.
2024-06-13
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/30/2024.
2024-06-03
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2024-05-20
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due June 21, 2024)
Attorneys
Mike Austin Anderson
Michael Scott Davis — Federal Public Defender's Office, Petitioner
United States
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Respondent