Did the District Court and the Eleventh Circuit use the incorrect standard to review the issues and thus incorrectly apply the law under Tolau v. Cotton?

Is the District Court and the Eleventh Circuit Court's decision both contrary to or involves an uncontradicted abdication of clearly established federal law as defined by the United States Supreme Court?

Does the probable cause standard apply to State law claims where the concept under federal law is Sovereign immunity, not applicable because [text unclear]?

Under federal law, the judicial officer supplied sufficient information to support an independent judgment that probable cause existed for the warrant?

Did the District Court dismiss the purpose and discriminate on Claim's use of the incorrect standard based on racial animus and not petitioner's criminal interest, the District Court?

Did the Eleventh Circuit and/or Court operated Counsel properly and timely notify the Petitioner of Rule 7 of the Mandate ordered September 30, 2024?

Did appellant's Counsel fail to properly represent by providing a copy of the Appellate Brief or Consult before the Initial brief?

Was the District Court and the Eleventh Circuit Court decision based on unreasonable determination of the facts instead of the evidence presented in the trial Court proceedings?

Did the District Court and the Eleventh Circuit use the incorrect standard to review the issues and thus incorrectly apply the law?