No. 23-7507
Kenneth Allen Washington v. Deputy Rayl, et al.
IFP
Tags: abuse-of-discretion appellate-procedure civil-procedure civil-rights constitutional-provisions court-of-appeals due-process judicial-discretion motion-to-extend ninth-circuit standing time-extension
Key Terms:
Securities
Securities
Latest Conference:
2024-09-30
Question Presented (from Petition)
Question not identified.
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Did the United States District Court Judge Abuse his discretion in denying the Plaintiff's motions?
Docket Entries
2024-10-07
Petition DENIED.
2024-08-30
Reply of petitioner Kenneth Washington filed. (Distributed)
2024-08-01
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/30/2024.
2024-07-15
Brief of Deputy Rayl, Deputy Raven, Deputy Mirrlle and Deputy Vawispowski in opposition submitted.
2024-07-15
Brief of respondent Deputy Rayl, et al. in opposition filed.
2024-05-30
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including July 15, 2024.
2024-05-29
Motion to extend the time to file a response from June 17, 2024 to July 15, 2024, submitted to The Clerk.
2024-04-27
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due June 17, 2024)
2024-01-22
Application (23A669) granted by Justice Barrett extending the time to file until May 13, 2024.
2024-01-10
Application (23A669) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from March 14, 2024 to May 13, 2024, submitted to Justice Barrett.
Attorneys
Deputy Rayl, Deputy Raven, Deputy Mirrlle and Deputy Vawispowski
Peter John Agostino — Anderson, Agostino & Keller, P.C., Respondent
Kenneth Washington
Kenneth Allen Washington — Petitioner