No. 23-7496

In Re Olamide O. Bello

Lower Court: N/A
Docketed: 2024-05-16
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
IFP
Tags: access-to-court access-to-courts constitutional-rights criminal-procedure due-process exculpatory-evidence ineffective-assistance-of-counsel prosecutorial-misconduct sixth-amendment speedy-trial-act standing
Key Terms:
HabeasCorpus
Latest Conference: 2024-06-06
Question Presented (from Petition)

Whether tre failure of tne Counsel to Pursue an appea\ Or Motion the
Pebttonee wWourd hove Ofnerwise Puvsyed Wolate tne Sixth amendment
Preyudice tn the Petitioner and denial Petitioner's actess-to- Court

A \hether re Prosecution of Information Content Powder and
\nderactwe Comourer Service Proader 4£or_Catent Created by "tnd Party"
and testimonies as a cesuil Of loteractwe Comouiter services 1s
Consttiutonal and iw actordante to Secton 230 of fommunicattoo
leceny ect

3. Whether \t ts Cyostitufonal to Prosecute a Gntrollng Person _pwirtwout
Q Primowy Violation bof Me Q@utio led Person :

ue. Whether the trtal Court Inque Juris dichon over can dffense nel
Under the federal \ow

5- Whether 4 15 Consttutional to force an Indiuidua\ to que wp tat
Which he was dot Lila fully and Un justly €nricla aad that whith no
existance of enrichment

b- Whether been Compelled to witness O4omst Self 16 Constituhonal

TWhetner the Speeds dytal Pet nas heen Violated and Pretrdal detenhon
Purishment js @nsttution al

Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether the failure of the counsel to pursue an appeal or motion the petitioner would have otherwise pursued violate the Sixth Amendment prejudice the petitioner and denial petitioner's access-to-court

Docket Entries

2024-06-10
Petition DENIED.
2024-05-22
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 6/6/2024.
2024-05-14

Attorneys

In Re Olamide O. Bello
Olamide O. Bello — Petitioner