No. 23-7481
Maurice Owen Wiley v. United States
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: conspiracy crime-of-violence criminal-conspiracy double-jeopardy fifth-amendment firearms firearms-possession hobbs-act
Latest Conference:
2024-06-06
Question Presented (from Petition)
DOES THE IMPOSITION OF CONSECUTIVE PUNISHMENTS FOR CONSPIRACY TO COMMIT HOBBS ACT ROBBERY IN VIOLATION OF 18 U.S.C. § 1951(a) and CONSPIRACY TO POSSESS FIREARMS IN FURTHERANCE OF A CRIME OF VIOLENCE IN VIOLATION OF 18 U.S.C. § 924(0) VIOLATE DEFENDANT'S RIGHTS UNDER THE UNDER THE DOUBLE JEOPARDY CLAUSE OF THE FIFTH AMENDMENT OF THE UNITED STATES CONSTITUTION WHERE THE EVIDENCE PRESENTED SHOWED A SINGLE CONSPIRACY TO COMMIT A ROBBERY WITH A FIREARM?
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Does the imposition of consecutive punishments for conspiracy to commit Hobbs Act robbery and conspiracy to possess firearms in furtherance of a crime of violence violate the Double Jeopardy Clause?
Docket Entries
2024-06-10
Petition DENIED.
2024-05-22
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 6/6/2024.
2024-05-20
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2024-05-09
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due June 13, 2024)
Attorneys
Maurice Wiley
John David Bryson — Wyatt, Early, et al., Petitioner
United States
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent