Does a federal habeas court's failure to review under 28 U.S.C. § 2254(d) the last reasoned state court decision adjudicating a federal claim's merits constitute a "defect" in the integrity of a habeas proceeding under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 60(b) and Gonzalez?

Does 28 U.S.C. § 2244(b)(3)(E) remove this Court's jurisdiction to review the Tenth Circuit's denial of a motion to remand what it construed as an unauthorized second-or-successive habeas petition?

Whether a federal habeas court's failure to review the last reasoned state court decision under 28 U.S.C. § 2254(d) is a defect under Rule 60(b)