Did the lower Court abuse its discretion by denying Petitioner's Petition for writ of actual innocence without looking back at the trial, or assessing whether Appellant/Petitioner could establish a substantial or significant fact possibility that the Appellant's misconduct caused harm to his case on evidence known at the time of his trial, the result of his trial may have been different?

b) Did the Circuit Court abuse its discretion when it denied Petitioner representation for his writ of actual innocence hearing?

Did the lower Courts apply incorrect legal standards and fail to recognize how the newly discovered evidence would have changed the case if it was presented to the jury, including Petitioner's trial preparation and ability, the State's likelihood of proving Blankenship's guilt beyond a reasonable doubt?

Did the lower court abuse its discretion by denying appellant's petition for writ of actual innocence without looking at the totality, or assessing whether appellant/petitioner could establish a substantial or significant possibility that Moreira's misconduct could have caused his conviction on evidence known at the time of his trial, the result of which may have been different?