Was there legally insufficient evidence to establish that venue was proper in the Southern District of New York for each count of conviction?

II. Was it reversible error for the district court to deny appellant's motion to suppress electronic devices seized in his apartment?

III. Was it reversible error for the district court to admit into evidence summary charts or reconstructions of alleged Backpage.com data over appellant's lack of foundation and hearsay objections?

IV. Did the district court abuse its discretion in denying appellant's motion pursuant to Fed. R. Crim P.33 to vacate his conviction and grant a new trial, or to hold an evidentiary hearing?

Was there legally insufficient evidence to establish that venue was proper in the Southern District of New York for each count of conviction?