why_did_qppelate.deteader (Manuela Hetniade2) lnttdlnd Lior pry case.._when Several avguable ments cpply (2

why wae, petiionee (luni Themis pose —gven HB years when te Mainimnua 1S 20 years

How Can. the. Stale. assume _provecaboa wasnt ta _ordes> Whea tere.ate._hiee_gaps__1a_the _video_that—bleaks th_ 4 dt d_coataus_a__qudi_2

Why_was tro piialonteats acy ewowaber wir Krew He actnas in my trial, thy _is_ this no whee inthe pranseniptes

thy was denied the _chaice tore ray | owyer On __

Whether the petitioner's due process rights were violated when several arguable issues apply to why the petitioner's sentence was excessive given the 18 years when the maximum is 20 years, and whether the state assumed provocation was not an order when the video that depicts the incident contains a quote to the contrary