No. 23-7438
Anthony Espinosa Gonzales v. United States
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: appellate-review computer-generated-evidence conviction court-of-appeals due-process evidence evidence-authentication evidentiary-standards federal-rule-of-evidence-901(b)(9) federal-rules-of-evidence judicial-procedure
Key Terms:
Privacy
Privacy
Latest Conference:
2024-06-06
Question Presented (from Petition)
Did the court of appeals' ratification of the use of computer-generated evidence to convict petitioner represent a clear departure from the requirements of Federal Rule of Evidence 901(b)(9)?
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Did the court of appeals' ratification of the use of computer-generated evidence to convict petitioner represent a clear departure from the requirements of Federal Rule of Evidence 901(b)(9)?
Docket Entries
2024-06-10
Petition DENIED.
2024-05-22
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 6/6/2024.
2024-05-15
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2024-05-07
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due June 10, 2024)
Attorneys
Anthony Gonzales
Daniel Lee Kaplan — Office of the Federal Public Defender, Petitioner
United States
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent